I’m not immediately familiar with today’s person, Felisa Wolfe-Simon, but that doesn’t mean she isn’t influential. Let’s take a look at her.
- She is a geobiochemical oceanographer.
- She has a doctorate in Oceanography.
- She also has a NASA fellowship in astrobiology.
- Her primary work focuses on the idea that (and I’m quoting because I don’t really understand it well enough to put it into my own words) “a bacterium called GFAJ-1 could substitute arsenic, poisonous for most life forms, for phosphorus, considered an essential element for all living cells.”
- That work is heavily disputed by others in her field and others claim to be unable to reproduce her results, a key part of the scientific process.
So, is she influential or not? I think it’s not a question that I can answer conclusively at this point. I think it depends a lot on whether or not her research turns out to be true. And that’s hard for me to answer because I don’t have the scientific background to be able to say whether or not her research is true. But it has stirred up quite the controversy in the scientific world – so I can’t say definitively whether it’s true or not because the scientific community can’t even decide whether it’s true or not. If her research is true, then it will change the way we think about life and how life works (according to everything I’ve read on it). And then she will have had a huge influence on the future and have been highly influential. If her research turns out to be just bad science, all she will be is the scientist who almost discovered something that didn’t exist and she might even become a laughingstock. So in my opinion, the jury is still out. Do you have any thoughts on Felisa Wolfe-Simon? Leave them below in the comments!
- Exclusive Interview: Discoverer of Arsenic Bacteria, in the Eye of the Storm
- Is This New Study the Nail in the Coffin of “Arsenic Life”?
- Beyond: Center of Fundamental Concepts in Science – Felisa Wolfe-Simon